|
Volume No. 47
Squeezing Blood Out of
That Turnip
I suspect all of you out there have someone that you rely on
for insight and perspective – that wise old mentor that
seems to have an unlimited depth of experience to draw from
in helping you navigate life’s little challenges. You know
those little parables and anecdotal tales that always relate
perfectly that very problem you’re trying to solve. Today, I
go to that well of experience in responding to a problem I
know many of you are facing right now- squeezing that last
drop of improvement that never fails to elude us.
First, the problem: Most of you out there in the performance
management world have worked for years trying to find hidden
value inside your organizations. Along that journey, some of
that value (be it cost savings, productivity improvements,
or gains in service delivery and customer satisfaction) has
come pretty easily.
We’ve all heard the term
– LOW HANGING FRUIT (I’ll refer to this as LHF). Problem is
that many of us haven’t heard that term lately. Why? Because
most of your organization’s have already captured those kind
of improvements… the kind that smack you in the face right
away even when you’re not looking…and are very easy (perhaps
too easy) to implement.
And along the way, capturing that LHF has created some real
superstars within your company. How familiar is this- upon
finding a bottomless pit of LHF, one of your esteemed, but
intellectually challenged colleagues becomes the “instant
hero” overnight! Reminds me of that FedEx commercial where
they go on that long retreat, and the woman gets the idea of
using FedEx in the first 30 seconds, and proceeds to get
showered with kudos.
Of course now, months or years later, you’re now in the role
of continuing in your esteemed colleague’s (aka new hero’s )
footsteps. Only the LHF you’re looking far has become much
harder to find. Those “bit hits” and “home runs” have become
fewer in frequency and impact. You work day and night to
make your assessments, ground your conclusions, align
management, and facilitate the necessary organizational
changes. You put in more (much more!) work than your
esteemed colleague ever put into it, but capture nothing
close to the impact of those initial wins. Where did all
that LHF go?
Truth is that it got replaced by the practice of “squeezing
blood out of the proverbial turnip.” And you’re the
corporate bloodsucker! You find yourself in that
under-appreciated job that no doubt produces a lot a value,
but not without several times the effort that used to be
required. That’s life for many of our performance managers
today. Boy, wouldn’t it be nice if someone made this job a
little easier?
Enter my mentor, and one of his anecdotal gems. He starts by
asking me to recall the first time I went out to the golf
course. I’m sure if you’re a golfer, his experience will
bring back similar memories. If not, just read on, as I’m
sure you’ll be able to relate, at least in spirit.
He recalls his 1st time on the course: More misses than hits,
a verrrrrrrrrry frustrating intro to the game…and probably
one he’ll give up pretty quickly. But he continues despite
his apprehension. It’s amazing how much one good shot (out
of over 100) will keep you coming back, but I digress.
5 rounds later, AT LAST, he has more hits than misses
– that moment of truth when the golfer gets “hooked,” and
alas, the confidence starts to build.
Round 10, now he’s starting to get the hang of it, and
feeling pretty good.
Round 15
–
end of his first full year- he’s cut his score by a whopping
25% (although he won’t mention our previous scores!)
Round 20
– the following season - after a couple of rounds dusting off
the “off-season rust,” he shaves off another 10-15%, and
he’s now shooting somewhat respectable scores (measured, of
course, not by the total stroke count, but rather by the
number of people who aren’t embarrassed to have him in their
foursome). He, on the other hand (although borderline
delusional) is now thinking Senior Tour!
Round 20-320 (over the course of 30 years), He spends the
rest of his golfing career trying to cut his score by
another 5%
– Where the heck is the LHF now, he asks???
And, of course, the story gets worse….
He has spent virtually no money (except for those second hand
clubs) getting that first 40% improvement, but could damn
near retire on the money he spent chasing the next 5% (the
latest driver, several hundred sleeves of those new balls
that go farther and straighter (NOT), greens fees at clubs
he has no business playing at…you get the idea). How in the
heck can I get that next 5%, he pleads? Am I that poor of an
athlete? Should I change my swing?
now here’s the punch line…
Most professionals don’t have this problem. Why, you might
ask. Are they just naturals? Sure, that’s part of it. But
there is more. My mentor calls this secret ingredient “the
art of diagnosis,” something all of us could be much better
at.
If you’ve ever read about the trials and tribulations of pro
golfers (a far better investment of time than that new
triple titanium, variable weighted, moon dust infused
driver!), you’ll find one common thread. They know how to
diagnose their game at a level we would never think of.
When we diagnose our game as an amateur (and it’s a stretch
to call most of us amateurs!)
– assuming we diagnose it at all
– we think about things like % of fairways hit, greens in
regulation, # total puts, etc…and that’s ok for a first cut.
But the pros go much deeper.
I recently read some work by Dave Pelz
– Phil Mickelson’s short game coach and advisor to several
tour players. For those of you who don’t know, Dave is an
ex-NASA engineer who worked on the first Lunar Module design
who, over the course of the last several years, has applied
his expertise to diagnosing and fixing the flaws of pro
golfers. Interesting career shift to say the least, but it
has paid off. His mission, is to help them find that next
5,4,3,2, and 1% (more like .001%) improvements. And how
exactly does he do that?
Dave knows the art of diagnosis, which is no doubt driven by
his engineering, scientific and technological prowess. Last
weekend, I saw a special Dave ran on the Golf Channel in
which he encouraged us amateurs to come up with a “short
game handicap”. Without going into a lot of detail, this SGH
didn’t just deal with one or two metrics, but many that
worked together. Things like shot dispersion with different
clubs, hit/miss ratios from points inside 30 yards for a
variety of shot types, putting success from a half dozen
different putt lengths and types, etc. You can see an
example of this at
http://www.golf.com/institute/sgh/sgh.aspx
Whether you’re a golfer, or identify better with another
sport, the message is the same.
Many of us would cringe at the depth of analysis that goes
into this one area of focus. In this case, the SGH only
deals with shots inside 100 yards. But if you talk to pros,
they’ll tell you that this guy is a miracle worker. Not
because of his athletic ability, but because of his savvy at
the art of diagnosis. He makes a living off of people (pros
and amateurs alike) who have fully captured the LOW HANGING
FRUIT, and want to begin sucking that turnip for some more
blood. And that’s very similar to our jobs in today’s
business environment as performance managers.
As performance managers, we must think like Dave. We must
design scorecards that operate effectively at the executive/
“results” level. But we must also possess diagnostic
measures that explore strengths and weaknesses in the very
processes that PRODUCE and/ or CONTRIBUTE to those executive
level results. We must be BRUTALLY HONEST with our baseline,
and diligent in our goal setting. We must diagnose,
challenge, and set new goals at the work-face- Goals that if
achieved will make a difference in one or more
sub-processes. In short, we must develop the equivalent of
Dave’s breakdown of the TOTAL handicap in to SUB HANDICAPS
like his Short Game and Putting-Only metrics.
There are many tools available to us that can help us achieve
this. Tools that help us design these kind of narrowly
focused, but strategically connected metrics and scorecards.
Tools that help us integrate these scorecards so that we can
see the rollup and rolldown effects on the bigger picture.
Tools that help us translate our strategic plan into its
manageable components. Tools that help us baseline and set
targets. Tools that help us benchmark against the outside
world. One of the things that our company (ePGI)
http://totalperformancemanagement.com has spent many years
focusing on is developing these types of integrated
scorecards for business, and helping organizations use them
to manage the small but vital pieces of that equation.
But whatever tools you select, the biggest challenge you will
face is changing the culture and mindset of the business.
Essentially, developing a mindset that recognizes the new
game we are in, and that those 1% gains are going to be a
lot harder to come by. A game where the entire focus is on
that Turnip, and how to get that last drop of blood out of
it. It is a culture of ACTIVE diagnosis and analysis, not
one of PASSIVE enterprise level KPI tracking and reporting.
And that challenge starts with you, the performance manager.
The bad news is that it will take the right tools, the right
culture, and a lot of hard work. The good news is that if
you can apply this art of diagnosis in the corporate world,
you’ll begin to find that next tier of performance
improvement, not to mention, a much lower golf handicap.
…And with
any luck, I’ll see you on the Senior Tour!
Author:
Bob Champagne is a Vice President of Performance Management
Solutions with UMS Group, Inc., a privately held
international
management consulting organization specializing in
Performance Management tools, systems, and solutions.
Included in UMS Group's product portfolio are a wide variety
of performance tracking, reporting, and benchmarking
solutions, as well as customized performance assessments and
diagnostic services. UMS Group has consulted with
hundreds of companies across numerous industries and
geographies. Visit UMS Group at
http://www.umsgroup.com
or contact us directly at 973-335-3555.
|