|
Volume No. 17
Too Much Time Treating
Symptoms?
A man drives down the highway each day on his way to work. On
Monday he gets a flat tire. Like anyone else, he takes his
lumps, changes his tire, and moves on.
One month later, almost to the day, the same darn thing
happens. Just his luck. Only this time, its raining and he
is forced to return home after changing his tire because he
had gotten his new suit filthy in the process.
Convinced that he's hitting a string of rotten luck, the man
buys a good raincoat, and develops a faster routine for
changing his tire (not bolting his spare down in the trunk,
keeping his tools out and available, and keeping the
raincoat close at hand). Next month, almost as predicted,
same thing happens. Only this time, he gets into a fender
bender trying to get over to the right shoulder to repair
the flat. Talk about the life of Job!
Nevertheless, it doesn't take long for him to go back to the
well for another creative solution. No more wrecks trying to
change a flat tire – nope, not for this guy. He's figured
out that its always the right front tire. In response to
this keen observation, he's now decided to always ride in
the left lane so that if (sorry, I mean when...) he gets
another flat, he can more quickly glide over to the
shoulder, avoiding risk of accident on his way to another
speedy tire change. He also decides to keep his speed lower
than normal so that if (when) another blowout occurs, he's
not endangering too many people. That is, until a highway
patrol officer pulls him over for clogging up the left/passing lane of the freeway. Back to the drawing board he
goes.
One of these days, that poor guy is going to figure out that
it might just be his wheel alignment that is causing the
problem. But not this time. Instead, like many of us, this
man is trained to react to symptoms rather than taking the
time analyzing the root cause.
A big problem with our performance measurement systems is
that they provide us too much information on symptoms, and
not enough feedback on our core system breakdowns. Does your
management system tell you when your tire has gone flat?
Does it measure the speed with which you change the tire? Or
does it alert you that your vehicle is pulling to the left,
outside of its normal control limits? The former is clearly
reactive, responding only to a plethora of symptoms. The
latter is proactive, and will lead your more quickly into a
mindset of real problem solving.
I've seen this play out all too often in the workplace. Take
a call center, for example, whose performance management
focus is on getting better at average speed of answer,
abandon rate, cost per call, and the many other indicators
that are all too common in that industry. But how many
companies look at the volume of calls per customer served?
Is it higher than it should be? What if we do something to
reduce the VOLUME of calls in the first place. Ahhhh...now
we're getting somewhere. Would you rather reduce the cost
per call by 10% (something that I guarantee you is envied by
EVERY call center manager out there), or eliminate the call
entirely by fixing the process (something that is valued by
every SHAREHOLDER out there!).
Reactive or proactive? Symptom or problem oriented? Activity
or process focused? What approach does your performance
management process favor?
Author:
Bob Champagne is a Vice President of Performance Management
Solutions with UMS Group, Inc., a privately held
international
management consulting organization specializing in
Performance Management tools, systems, and solutions.
Included in UMS Group's product portfolio are a wide variety
of performance tracking, reporting, and benchmarking
solutions, as well as customized performance assessments and
diagnostic services. UMS Group has consulted with
hundreds of companies across numerous industries and
geographies. Visit UMS Group at
http://www.umsgroup.com
or contact us directly at 973-335-3555.
|